Tag: DOT

eCCF

Quest Diagnostics Approved to Use eCCF for Federally-Mandated Workforce

August 18, 2016

Benefits of eCCF include fewer data entry and legibility issues, reduced collection site flaws, less paper to manage and improved overall efficiency.

eCCF

eCCF update: The paperless revolution

August 8, 2016

Federal eCCF inspections are complete and all Quest Diagnostics drug testing labs are approved to process electronic Custody and Control Forms.

Reasons for Testing

Reasons for testing: Follow-up drug testing

March 8, 2016

Follow-up drug testing is for employees who have previously tested positive for illicit substances or violated a company’s drug and alcohol policy.

News

2016 DOT Random Testing Rates

January 5, 2016

The Office of Drug & Alcohol Policy & Compliance has published the 2016 Department of Transportation Random Testing Rates.

eCCF

Preparing for the electronic Custody and Control Form (eCCF)

November 18, 2015

As we prepare to begin using the regulated eCCF, we are making design changes to our interfaces that will affect eCCF users.

Collections

Preparing for a drug test collection

July 30, 2015

When preparing for a drug test collection, donors should follow these best practices to help ensure an optimal collection experience.

News

Employee drug and alcohol testing handbook

July 1, 2015

Answers to common drug testing questions are now found in the newly updated Department of Transportation Employee Handbook.

Oral Fluid testing

Proposed guidelines impacting workplace drug testing programs

May 20, 2015

The Department of Health and Human Services published two notices that could lead to important changes in federal drug testing requirements.

eCCF

Regulated electronic Custody and Control Form (eCCF) use approved

April 15, 2015

On April 13, the DOT published a Notice of a Final Rule which allows employers, collectors, labs and MROs to use eCCFs for regulated drug testing programs.

eCCF

Electronic Chain of Custody Forms and regulated testing

June 5, 2014

eCCF advantages include fewer data entry and legibility errors, reduced paper consumption, and specimen tracking throughout the testing process.